Atomic energy level diagrams

Lead energy level diagram

Energy levels and transitions of neutral lead (Pb I): the 31 strongest classified lines below 2 µm from the NIST Atomic Spectra Database and the 15 levels they connect, each line with its vacuum wavelength, frequency and, for 29 of them, the reduced dipole matrix element derived from the NIST transition rate. Measured lifetimes, transition rates, hyperfine constants and isotope shifts from the literature are included, each with its citation.

Hover a line or a level to isolate it, click to keep it selected. Scroll to zoom, drag to move.

Lead energy level diagram with transition wavelengths and dipole matrix elements

Download: diagram (PDF) diagram (SVG) transitions (CSV) levels (CSV) source code

Key transitions of lead

Transitionλ vac (nm)λ air (nm)ν (THz)|⟨J‖er‖J′⟩| (ea₀)A (s⁻¹)Γ/2π up. (MHz)branch (%)Use
(1/2,1/2)0 – (1/2,1/2)°1283.3887283.30531057.88441.2854.900e+0726.5329.4ground-state resonance line
(3/2,1/2)1 – (1/2,1/2)°1364.0605363.9568823.46881.5123.200e+0726.5319.2isotope shifts and hyperfine structure measured by Dopple…
(3/2,1/2)1 – (1/2,1/2)°0368.4511368.3462813.65611.8391.370e+0823.41100proposed laser-cooling / magneto-optical-trap cycling line
(3/2,1/2)2 – (1/2,1/2)°1405.8953405.7807738.59562.9859.000e+0726.5354the Pb I line used for lead abundances in stellar spectra
(1/2,1/2)0 – (3/2,1/2)2938.9383938.6807319.2888––––electric-quadrupole line measured by Faraday-rotation spe…
(1/2,1/2)0 – (3/2,1/2)11278.89301278.5432234.4156–7.190e+001.137e-06100magnetic-dipole line used for parity-nonconservation opti…

λ, ν from NIST level energies unless a measured frequency for this isotope is available. A: measured value or NIST. Γ/2π: natural linewidth of the upper level, 1/(2πτ).

207Pb hyperfine structure (I = 1/2)

LevelA (MHz)B (MHz)Shift of each F level from the centre of gravity (MHz)
(3/2,1/2)1-2389.4(7)–F=1/2: +2389.40 F=3/2: -1194.70
(3/2,1/2)22600.8(9)–F=3/2: -3901.20 F=5/2: +2600.80
(3/2,3/2)2609.820(8)–F=3/2: -914.73 F=5/2: +609.82
(1/2,1/2)°18802.0(16)–F=1/2: -8802.00 F=3/2: +4401.00
2[5/2]°23094(9)–F=3/2: -4641.00 F=5/2: +3094.00
2[3/2]°2-1456.000–F=3/2: +2184.00 F=5/2: -1456.00
2[3/2]°1-2884.000–F=1/2: +2884.00 F=3/2: -1442.00
2[5/2]°32072(8)–F=5/2: -4144.00 F=7/2: +3108.00
(3/2,1/2)°21734.000–F=3/2: -2601.00 F=5/2: +1734.00

Measured A, B constants; sources in the data file.

Isotope shifts

Transitionλ vac (nm)IsotopesShift (MHz)
(1/2,1/2)0 – (1/2,1/2)°1283.389204-208-4212.0(25)
(1/2,1/2)0 – (1/2,1/2)°1283.389206-208-2226.6(25)
(1/2,1/2)0 – (1/2,1/2)°1283.389207-208-1390.0(25)
(3/2,1/2)2 – (1/2,1/2)°1405.895206-208-2428.00
(3/2,1/2)2 – (1/2,1/2)°1405.895204-208-4587.00
(3/2,1/2)2 – (1/2,1/2)°1405.895207-208-1569.00
(1/2,1/2)0 – (3/2,1/2)11278.893206-208220.4(15)
(1/2,1/2)0 – (3/2,1/2)11278.893207-208138.0(17)

Shift = ν(first isotope) − ν(second isotope).

Closed and nearly closed transitions of lead

Transitionλ vacuum (nm)Lower levelA (s⁻¹)Leak per scattered photonPhotons before a leakWhere the leak goes
(3/2,1/2)1 → (1/2,1/2)°0368.4511metastable1.370e+08 NISTclosed–no other level can be reached by electric-dipole decay
(3/2,1/2)2 → 2[5/2]°3280.2821metastable1.610e+08 NIST2.25 % from this site's HFR fit44(3/2,3/2)2 2.13 % (long-lived); (1/2,3/2)2 ≈ 0.124 %
(3/2,1/2)2 → 2[5/2]°2287.4154metastable3.800e+07 NIST5.1 % from this site's HFR fit20(3/2,3/2)2 3 % (long-lived); (1/2,1/2)1 ≈ 1.85 %; (3/2,1/2)1 0.245 % (long-lived); 2 weaker lines

A transition is closed when its upper level can decay only to the level it was excited from, so the atom keeps scattering photons. “closed”: among the levels NIST lists, no other level below the upper level has the opposite parity and |ΔJ| ≤ 1, so no other electric-dipole decay exists. Otherwise the leak is the sum of the branching ratios of the other decay lines of the upper level (or 1 − branching ratio where that of the line itself has been measured), and the number of photons is 1 / leak. “≥” and “≤”: at least one possible decay path has no listed rate, so the leak is a lower limit. These numbers are derived from the branching ratios, lifetimes and rates of this page, not measured as such; the tag names the weakest of the inputs, * marks theory and ≈ a model or semi-empirical calculation. Listed: lines that start on the ground level or on a metastable level and leak at most 10 %, unless more than three possible decay paths have no listed rate. Fine-structure levels only: hyperfine and Zeeman dark states and forbidden decays without a listed rate are not considered. Select a line in the diagram for the full list of its leak channels.

Listed Pb transitions below 2 µm

Lower levelUpper levelλ vacuum (nm)λ air (nm)ν (THz)Type|⟨J‖er‖J′⟩| (ea₀)A (s⁻¹)Branching (%)Source of matrix element / A
(1/2,1/2)0(3/2,1/2)°1202.2669202.20181482.1624E10.269 NIST5.900e+06 NIST2.89NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(1/2,1/2)0(1/2,1/2)°1205.3939205.32821459.5976E10.362 NIST1.020e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C)
(1/2,1/2)02[3/2]°1217.0684217.00031381.0970E11.492 NIST1.470e+08 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)1(3/2,1/2)°1240.2671240.19391247.7468E10.702 NIST2.400e+07 NIST11.8NIST ASD (accuracy C)
(3/2,1/2)1(1/2,1/2)°0244.4569244.38291226.3610E10.650 theory5.860e+07 theory–Maser, Hoenig, Wang, Rupasinghe, Porsev, Safronova, Majumder, "High-precision measurement…
(3/2,1/2)1(1/2,1/2)°1244.6922244.61811225.1820E10.635 NIST1.860e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)1(3/2,1/2)°2247.7126247.63781210.2432E10.988 NIST2.600e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)2(3/2,1/2)°1257.8031257.72591162.8736E11.137 NIST5.100e+07 NIST25NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)12[3/2]°1261.4435261.36551146.6815E10.763 NIST2.200e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)12[3/2]°2261.4955261.41751146.4535E12.956 NIST1.980e+08 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)2(1/2,1/2)°1262.9046262.82621140.3088E10.332 NIST4.100e+06 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy D)
(3/2,1/2)12[5/2]°2265.7884265.70941127.9364E10.0674 NIST9.800e+04 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)2(3/2,1/2)°2266.3946266.31541125.3700E11.768 NIST6.700e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)22[5/2]°3280.2821280.19951069.6097E13.500 NIST1.610e+08 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)22[3/2]°2282.4020282.31891061.5804E11.225 NIST2.700e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(1/2,1/2)0(1/2,1/2)°1283.3887283.30531057.8844E11.285 NIST4.900e+07 NIST29.4NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)22[5/2]°2287.4154287.33111043.0632E11.492 NIST3.800e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,3/2)2(3/2,1/2)°1357.3749357.2729838.8738E12.587 NIST9.900e+07 NIST48.5NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)1(1/2,1/2)°1364.0605363.9568823.4688E11.512 NIST3.200e+07 NIST19.2NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,3/2)2(1/2,1/2)°1367.2537367.1491816.3090E11.508 NIST3.100e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C)
(3/2,1/2)1(1/2,1/2)°0368.4511368.3462813.6561E11.839 NIST1.370e+08 NIST100NIST ASD (accuracy B)
(3/2,3/2)2(3/2,1/2)°2374.0998373.9935801.3702E13.071 NIST7.300e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy B)
(3/2,3/2)22[5/2]°3402.0768401.9632745.6099E10.887 NIST3.500e+06 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,1/2)2(1/2,1/2)°1405.8953405.7807738.5956E12.985 NIST9.000e+07 NIST54NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,3/2)22[3/2]°1406.3283406.2136737.8084E13.023 NIST9.200e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy B)
(3/2,3/2)22[5/2]°2416.9208416.8033719.0634E10.463 NIST1.200e+06 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy D+)
(3/2,3/2)0(3/2,1/2)°1500.6813500.5416598.7691E12.240 NIST2.700e+07 NIST13.2NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(3/2,3/2)0(1/2,1/2)°1520.2886520.1437576.2042E11.709 NIST1.400e+07 NIST–NIST ASD (accuracy C)
(3/2,3/2)2(1/2,1/2)°1723.0958722.8966414.5958E10.690 NIST8.500e+05 NIST0.51NIST ASD (accuracy C+)
(1/2,1/2)0(3/2,1/2)2938.9383938.6807319.2888E2––––
(1/2,1/2)0(3/2,1/2)11278.89301278.5432234.4156M1–7.190e+00 theory100Zheng, Wang, Verma, Wang, Langin, DeMille, "Simulated Laser Cooling and Magneto-Optical T…

Reduced dipole matrix elements follow the convention A = ω³|d|²/(3πε₀ħc³(2J′+1)), with J′ the upper level. Tags show where a number comes from: measured, NIST compilation, high-accuracy theory, this site's own Cowan-code calculation with the parameters fitted to the NIST energies (HFR fit; inputs and fit report in the repository folder cowan/; used only where nothing else gives a rate; strong lines typically within a factor 2, weak lines worse), or a model calculation.

Pb energy levels

LevelEnergy (cm⁻¹)JParityLifetimegJHyperfine A (MHz)Hyperfine B (MHz)Lifetime sourceHyperfine source
(1/2,1/2)00.0000evenstable–––––
(3/2,1/2)17819.2631even140 ms theory1.501-2389.4–Zheng, Wang, Verma, Wang, Langin, DeMille, "Simulated Laser Cooling and Magneto-Optical T…Bouazza, Gough, Hannaford, Lowe, Wilson, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012516 (2000) (Doppler-free sat…
(3/2,1/2)210650.3272even–1.2692600.8––Bouazza, Gough, Hannaford, Lowe, Wilson, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012516 (2000) (Doppler-free sat…
(3/2,3/2)221457.7982even–1.23609.82––Lurio, Landman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 759 (1970), as quoted in Tables II and VI of Porsev …
(3/2,3/2)029466.8300even––––––
(1/2,1/2)°034959.9080odd6.8 ns measured–––Biémont, Garnir, Palmeri, Li, Svanberg, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 312, 116 (2000) (time-r…–
(1/2,1/2)°135287.2241odd6 ns measured1.3498802–Biémont, Garnir, Palmeri, Li, Svanberg, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 312, 116 (2000) (time-r…Bouazza, Gough, Hannaford, Lowe, Wilson, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012516 (2000) (Doppler-free sat…
2[5/2]°245443.1712odd–0.7963094––Wasowicz, Drozdowski, Kwela, Phys. Scr. 71, 274 (2005); 72, 200 (2005); Eur. Phys. J. Spe…
2[3/2]°246060.8362odd–1.247-1456––Porsev, Kozlov, Safronova, Tupitsyn, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012501 (2016), arXiv:1510.06679, Ta…
2[3/2]°146068.4381odd–0.864-2884––Porsev, Kozlov, Safronova, Tupitsyn, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012501 (2016), arXiv:1510.06679, Ta…
2[5/2]°346328.6673odd–1.1162072––Wasowicz, Drozdowski, Kwela, Phys. Scr. 71, 274 (2005); 72, 200 (2005); Eur. Phys. J. Spe…
(3/2,1/2)°248188.6302odd–1.4961734––Porsev, Kozlov, Safronova, Tupitsyn, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012501 (2016), arXiv:1510.06679, Ta…
(1/2,1/2)°148686.9341odd–1.304––––
(1/2,1/2)°048726.2620odd––––––
(3/2,1/2)°149439.6161odd4.9 ns measured1.131––Biémont, Garnir, Palmeri, Li, Svanberg, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 312, 116 (2000) (time-r…–

Pb⁺ ionisation limit 59819.56 cm⁻¹ = 7.41668 eV (167.169 nm)

Sources

LS labels follow Porsev et al.; the NIST jj / J1K labels are given after the '=' sign (mapping checked against the energies in Porsev's Table V). Entries 'rme_J_ea0' are CALCULATED (CI+all-order) and marked theory; experiment-derived matrix elements quoted second-hand are kept under 'rme_J_ea0_reported' because they disagree with each other. Isotope shifts are nu(first) - nu(second); the 1.28 um M1 line shifts are positive as printed (opposite sign to the 283.3 nm line). The 405.78 nm shifts are derived from wavenumbers printed in a stellar-abundance paper that copied Bouazza's Table I, good to about 3 MHz. The three lifetimes of Biémont et al. were read on the publisher's HTML page by an automated reader (the paper's tables are images) and should be checked against the PDF. 'E2_rme_ea0sq' is an electric-quadrupole amplitude, not a dipole matrix element.

Atoms with measured data

All elements: periodic table